Prophetic Counter-Witness Embodied in Faithful Presence
In an increasingly post-Christian world, believers find themselves navigating environments where Christianity’s once-prominent cultural influence has diminished or been outright rejected. Rather than retreating into isolated enclaves or compromising biblical truth, disciples of Jesus are called to maintain a prophetic yet winsome presence—embodying God’s redemptive purposes through acts of care that transcend mere service to participate in His transformative mission. This article explores how Christians can meaningfully engage in redemptive care within spaces of diminished Christian influence, grounding our approach in biblical examples and theological frameworks that equip us for faithful witness in minority contexts.
Understanding Redemptive Care in God’s Mission
Redemptive care represents far more than isolated acts of kindness or service—it embodies participation in the missio Dei (mission of God), recognizing that all genuine transformation flows from God’s redemptive work in the world. As I explained elsewhere, “Redemptive Care is a holistic approach to caregiving that views acts of care as participation in God’s redemptive work in the world” (Watke, 2024). This approach combines meeting immediate human needs with the recognition that care has transformative potential, contributing to the restoration and healing of individuals, communities, and creation itself.
When we situate redemptive care within God’s mission, we recognize that our actions are not merely humanitarian gestures but participation in divine activity. The missio Dei theological concept frames mission not as something Christians do as a separate activity but as active participation in God’s ongoing redemptive work. As Christopher Wright (2006) argues, “It is not so much that God has a mission for his church in the world, but that God has a church for his mission in the world.” The church doesn’t simply do mission; it exists for mission as the visible manifestation of God’s redemptive purposes. Or as Jurgen Moltmann (1977) explains: “It is not the church that has a mission of salvation to fulfill in the world; it is the mission of the Son and the Spirit through the Father that includes the church.” There is church because there is mission, not vice versa (Aagaard 1974).
Prophetic Witness in Minority Contexts: Biblical Models
The Bible provides numerous examples of faithful witness in contexts where God’s people were a religious minority facing hostile or indifferent majority cultures. These biblical models offer practical wisdom for contemporary believers navigating spaces of diminished Christian influence:
Joseph: Integrity in Pagan Systems
Joseph maintained unwavering integrity within Egypt’s pagan political system, rising to a position of influence without compromising his faith. His story demonstrates how believers can work within secular structures while remaining faithful to God’s standards. Genesis 41:38 records Pharaoh’s recognition: “Can we find a man like this, in whom is the Spirit of God?”
Joseph’s example teaches that redemptive care includes:
- Working with excellence that garners respect from non-believers
- Using influence to implement just policies that benefit all people
- Maintaining clear ethical boundaries without unnecessary cultural isolation
Daniel: Prophetic Presence in Babylon
Daniel and his companions exemplified how to maintain distinctive faith commitments while serving in Babylon’s government. They demonstrated principled flexibility—adapting to Babylonian education and customs where possible while drawing clear lines when compliance would require disobedience to God.
Daniel 1:8 records, “Daniel resolved that he would not defile himself with the king’s food, or with the wine that he drank.” Yet Daniel 1:17 notes, “God gave them learning and skill in all literature and wisdom.” This balance of cultural engagement without compromise provides a powerful model for contemporary believers in secularized contexts.
Esther: Strategic Influence for Good
Queen Esther operated in a Persian court where her Jewish identity remained hidden until a critical moment when advocacy was needed. Her story illustrates how believers in minority contexts can exercise strategic influence for justice and the common good.
Mordecai’s challenge to Esther—”Who knows whether you have not come to the kingdom for such a time as this?” (Esther 4:14)—reminds us that God sovereignly places His people in specific cultural locations for redemptive purposes.
The Early Church: Counter-Cultural Community
The early Christians faced a hostile Roman Empire, yet they established counter-cultural communities characterized by radical love, hospitality, and care for the marginalized. As sociologist Rodney Stark (1996) observes, early Christians’ compassionate response during plagues—staying to care for the sick when pagans fled—played a significant role in Christianity’s spread throughout the Roman Empire.
Acts 2:42-47 describes this distinctive community life: “And all who believed were together and had all things in common… and day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.”
The Cultural Dimension of Redemptive Care
When engaging in redemptive care across diverse cultural contexts, we must recognize how culture profoundly shapes human identity and spiritual understanding:
Culture as Soul Formation
Culture functions as a powerful force in soul formation, providing frameworks (worldviews) of meaning, value systems, and patterns of relationship that shape human identity from birth. As missiologist Paul Hiebert (2008) notes, “Like glasses, they [worldviews] shape how we see the world, but we are rarely aware of their presence.” This recognition requires cultural humility in our redemptive care, acknowledging that our own cultural lenses influence how we understand both problems and solutions.
Cultural Expressions of Brokenness
Sin’s effects on human beings manifest differently across cultural contexts. Shame-based cultures may experience spiritual brokenness primarily as honor violation, while guilt-based cultures may experience it as moral transgression. As Andrew Walls explains, the gospel is communicated through human cultures. It makes use of the forms of each culture to express the good news… But each expression of the gospel represents also a critique of that culture (Walls, 1999).
Cultural Expressions of Spiritual Brokenness in Nontheism
Within nontheism, spiritual brokenness often manifests as existential anxiety and a struggle for meaning without transcendent frameworks. Nontheists may experience this as profound disconnection—from heritage, community rituals, and shared moral narratives that religion traditionally provides. This disconnection can create identity voids and feelings of cosmic insignificance.
The burden of self-created meaning generates unique psychological strains. Nontheists sometimes exhibit “spiritual homesickness”—nostalgia for religious certainties without embracing their metaphysical claims. The absence of formalized grief practices or life transitions can leave significant emotional gaps during major life events.
Many nontheists actively seek alternative meaning systems through secular community building, philosophical inquiry, and naturalistic wonder to address these expressions of spiritual brokenness.
Within the United States, the prevalence of nontheism may be seen among deists (practiced nontheism), and among adherents of antitheism, apatheism, humanism, scientism, agnosticism and atheism — predominantly seen in the western and northeastern regions.
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| Source: Perspectiva Worldviews 2024, Missional International The darkest areas in the thematic density maps indicate the places with the highest percentage of nontheistic population. |
|
Worldview Engagement
Effective redemptive care requires understanding and engaging the underlying worldviews that shape how people interpret reality. Paul’s approach at the Areopagus (Acts 17) demonstrates contextual gospel presentation that connects with Athenian philosophical categories while challenging their foundational assumptions. He begins with cultural connection points—”I perceive that in every way you are very religious” (Acts 17:22)—before moving to proclamation of the unknown God and resurrection truth that directly challenges their worldview.
Interculturality and Redemptive Care
Interculturality—the dynamic and reciprocal exchange between cultures—stands at the heart of God’s redemptive mission. The Pentecost narrative in Acts 2 demonstrates God’s affirmation of cultural and linguistic diversity while creating unity through the gospel. Each person heard the disciples “telling in our own tongues the mighty works of God” (Acts 2:11), establishing cultural diversity as a divine pattern rather than a problem to be solved.
This interculturality requires:
- Cultural Humility: Approaching other cultures with genuine openness to learn, recognizing that God has been at work within all cultural contexts before our arrival.
- Mutual Transformation: Authentic redemptive care across cultures involves mutual transformation where all parties are changed through genuine encounter with the other, reflecting Christ’s kenotic pattern.
- Intercultural Hermeneutics: The interpretation of Scripture becomes enriched through intercultural dialogue, as diverse cultural perspectives illuminate different dimensions of biblical truth.
Prophetic Engagement in Spaces of Diminished Christian Influence
How can believers maintain meaningful prophetic presence in contexts where Christianity has been marginalized? Several approaches emerge:
Winsome Witness Without Compromise
Believers are called to maintain uncompromising commitment to biblical truth while embodying winsome grace in relationships. As 1 Peter 3:15-16 instructs, “Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect.”
This approach rejects both harsh judgmentalism and theological compromise, seeking instead to embody truth with grace—just as Jesus was “full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). Missiologist Leslie Newbigin (1989) described this approach as a community of faith and hopeful action in the “multifaith, multiculture, multirace world” of many lords and gods that exists today.
Cultural Discernment: Affirm, Reject, Transform
Engaging in redemptive care requires careful cultural discernment, following Richard Niebuhr’s guidance to:
- Affirm what aligns with God’s truth in each cultural context
- Reject what contradicts biblical values and principles
- Transform what can be redeemed through gospel engagement
This discernment process avoids both uncritical cultural accommodation and wholesale cultural rejection, seeking instead what Timothy Keller calls “contextual translation” of the gospel into each cultural setting.
Creative Minority Status
Rather than lamenting lost cultural influence, believers can embrace what American church planter and pastor Jon Tyson called “creative minority” status. This approach views marginalization not as defeat but opportunity for distinctive witness through the redemptive participation of faithful and fruitful presence such as:
- Alternative Communities: Creating spaces where kingdom values are lived out in contrast to surrounding culture
- Entrepreneurial Innovation: Developing creative approaches to address social needs from Christian perspective
- Strategic Partnerships: Collaborating with those who share common concerns for justice and human flourishing, even if their motivations differ
Redemptive Care and Verbal Gospel Proclamation
While redemptive care includes practical service and cultural engagement, it must maintain the centrality of verbal gospel proclamation. As Romans 10:14 asks, “How are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard?” Authentic redemptive care integrates word and deed in holistic witness:
Word and Deed Unity
Acts of redemptive care and verbal proclamation are not competing alternatives but complementary expressions of the same mission. John Stott famously wrote: “The Great Commission neither explains, nor exhausts, nor supersedes the Great Commandment.” He emphasized that our love is to be like God’s love; and God’s love is holy love. He stressed that what is needed is not just an experience of God’s love but a true understanding of it and the willingness to share that experiential understanding with others (Stott, 1975). The verbal sharing of salvation through Jesus Christ gives ultimate meaning and context to acts of care.
Total Redemption Required
The comprehensive nature of human brokenness requires total redemption that only Christ can provide. As Colossians 1:13-14 declares, “He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.”
Breaking Sin’s Confederacy
Only Christ’s redemptive work can break the interlocking patterns of sin that bind individuals and communities, dismantling the confederacies of evil that human effort alone cannot overcome. The gospel offers not piecemeal solutions to isolated moral failures but comprehensive deliverance from sin’s entire ecosystem.
Practical Strategies for Redemptive Care in Secular Contexts
How can believers practically implement redemptive care in spaces of diminished Christian influence? Several strategic approaches emerge:
Vocational Faithfulness
Christians engage in redemptive care through vocational faithfulness, viewing their work as participation in God’s creative and restorative purposes. Theologian Amy Sherman suggests that our work as vocational stewardship is to serve as foretastes of the coming kingdom of God by embodying peace with God, self, others, and the creation (Sherman, 2011). This involves:
- Pursuing excellence that earns the right to be heard
- Identifying redemptive opportunities within each vocational context
- Addressing both technical and adaptive challenges from biblical perspective
Third Places and Hospitality
Creating “third places”—neither work nor home but spaces for authentic community—provides opportunities for redemptive relationships across cultural and religious differences. Hospitality becomes a powerful means of redemptive care, following the scriptural admonition: “Show hospitality to one another without grumbling” (1 Peter 4:9).
Sociologist Ray Oldenburg notes that third places facilitate “the core settings of informal public life” where diverse people can connect authentically (Oldenburg, 1999). Christians have historical precedent for creating such spaces, from early house churches to medieval monasteries to modern coffee shops and community centers run with redemptive intent.
Common Grace Collaboration
Redemptive care often involves collaborating with non-Christians around “common grace” concerns—issues where believers and non-believers can work together despite differing ultimate motivations. Abraham Kuyper’s concept of common grace reminds us that God’s restraining and enabling grace operates even in secular contexts, creating opportunities for meaningful partnership.
Such collaboration requires what Jonathan Leeman calls “principled pluralism”—maintaining clear Christian conviction while finding practical common ground with those of different worldviews. This approach recognizes, as Jesus taught, that “whoever is not against us is for us” (Mark 9:40) in many practical matters.
Cultural Translation and Apologetics
Effective redemptive care requires “cultural translation”—communicating biblical truth in language and concepts accessible to each cultural context. Missiologist Andrew Walls notes that Christian faith must go on being translated, must continuously enter into vernacular culture and interact with it, or it withers and fades (Walls, 1996).
This translation process involves:
- Identifying redemptive analogies within each culture
- Addressing the specific idols and assumptions of each context
- Framing the gospel to address each culture’s deepest questions and aspirations
The Transformative Impact of Redemptive Care
When believers faithfully engage in redemptive care within secular contexts, transformation occurs at multiple levels:
Personal Transformation
Individuals experience holistic redemption through Christ, addressing not just spiritual needs but restoring identity, purpose, and wholeness. As 2 Corinthians 5:17 declares, “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.”
Community Formation
Redemptive care leads to the formation of counter-cultural communities that embody kingdom values and practices. As sociologist James Davison Hunter observes, “Cultural change at its most profound level occurs through dense networks (of relationships)…and institutions” (Hunter, 2010). When believers form these “faithful presence” communities, they create spaces where alternative ways of living become visible and attractive.
Cultural Renewal
Over time, faithful redemptive care contributes to broader cultural renewal, as Christian influence radiates outward from transformed lives and communities. Andy Crouch suggests that culture is not changed simply by thinking differently, but by the creation of a new cultural good that makes a more abundant life possible (Crouch, 2008).
Conclusion: Faithful Presence for God’s Glory
Redemptive care in spaces of diminished Christian influence ultimately flows from and points toward God’s glory. Our calling is not to regain cultural power or influence but to faithfully represent Christ’s kingdom through loving engagement with our neighbors and cultural contexts.
James Davison Hunter argues that the call of faithful presence gives priority to what God’s word tells us about the good in every circumstance and context in which we find ourselves…The directive to actively seek the welfare of the city, not as an expedient but as the path to which we are called, liberates Christians to practice redemptive care. (Hunter, 2010).
This faithful presence requires both prophetic counter-witness against cultural idolatries and compassionate engagement with human needs. It maintains biblical conviction while demonstrating Christlike love. It proclaims truth while embodying grace. And it trusts that even when numerical growth isn’t evident, our participation in God’s redemptive mission bears eternal significance.
As we practice redemptive care in spaces of diminished Christian influence, we can take encouragement from Jesus’ promise: “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden” (Matthew 5:14). Even in minority contexts—perhaps especially there—the light of Christ shines most distinctively through those who embody His redemptive purposes in word and deed.
References
Aagaard, A. M. (1974). “Missio Dei in katholischer Sicht.” Evangelische Theologie. Vol 34, pp 420-433.
Brueggemann, W. (2001). The Prophetic Imagination. Fortress Press.
Crouch, A. (2008). Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling. InterVarsity Press.
Hiebert, P. G. (2008). Transforming Worldviews: An Anthropological Understanding of How People Change. Baker Academic.
Hunter, J. D. (2010). To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World. Oxford University Press.
Keller, Timothy (2012). Center Church: Doing Balanced, Gospel-Centered Ministry in Your City. Zondervan.
Kuyper, Abraham (2015). Common Grace (Volume 1): God’s Gifts for a Fallen World (Abraham Kuyper Collected Works in Public Theology). Lexham Press.
Leeman, Jonathan (2016). Political Church: The Local Assembly as Embassy of Christ’s Rule (Studies in Christian Doctrine and Scripture). IVP Academic.
Moltmann, J. (1977). The Church in the Power of the Spirit: A Contribution to Messianic Ecclesiology. SCM Press.
Newbigin, L. (1989). The Gospel in a Pluralist Society. Eerdmans.
Niebuhr, H. Richard. (1951). Christ and Culture. Harper & Row.
Oldenburg, R. (1999). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. Marlowe & Company.
Sherman, A. L. (2011). Kingdom Calling: Vocational Stewardship for the Common Good. InterVarsity Press.
Stark, R. (1996). The Rise of Christianity: A Sociologist Reconsiders History. Princeton University Press.
Stott, J. R. W. (1975). Christian Mission in the Modern World. InterVarsity Press.
Tyson, J., Grizzle, H. (2016). A Creative Minority: Influencing Culture through Redemptive Participation. Grizzle Publications.
Walls, A. F. (1996). The Missionary Movement in Christian History: Studies in the Transmission of Faith. Orbis Books.
Watke, C. (2024). “Redemptive Care and the Missio Dei: An Intercultural Framework.” Missional University.
Wright, C. J. H. (2006). The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible’s Grand Narrative. InterVarsity Press.

Dr. Curt Watke is a distinguished missiologist whose three-plus-decade-long career has significantly impacted Christian mission work in North America, particularly in under-reached and challenging regions. Holding a Ph.D. in Evangelism and Missions, Dr. Watke has focused on bridging cultural gaps and fostering sustainable Christian communities by developing innovative strategies that address contemporary challenges like globalization, urbanization, and religious pluralism. His emphasis on cultural sensitivity and contextualization in mission work is reflected in his collaborative writings, including notable works such as “Ministry Context Exploration: Understanding North American Cultures” and “Starting Reproducing Congregations.” Beyond his writing, Dr. Watke is a sought-after speaker and educator, lecturing at seminaries and conferences worldwide, and his teachings continue to inspire and equip new generations of missional leaders. His enduring legacy is marked by unwavering dedication to the mission of God and a profound influence on missional thought and practice. Dr. Watke serves as President and Professor of Evangelism & Missiology at Missional University.


