Introduction

From a missional perspective, moral, social, and equitable theology calls Christians to embody God’s transformative justice in a broken world. These disciplines, rooted in biblical mandates, urge believers to address poverty, systemic inequity, and ethical failures as integral to gospel witness. Yet, many Christians remain disengaged, prioritizing personal salvation over collective justice, evangelism over societal transformation, and piety over prophetic action – even though biblically it is all of the above. This apathy undermines the holistic mission of God (missio Dei), which integrates redemption with social renewal, as seen in Micah 6:8’s call to “act justly and love mercy.” Drawing on scholars like Voddie Baucham and Miroslav Volf, this article explores seven reasons for this unconcern, grounded in scripture and academic critique. From ideological confusion to historical compromises, these barriers reveal a fractured theology that dilutes the Christian’s role as an agent of shalom. Addressing them rekindles a missional commitment to equitable justice, aligning believers with Jesus’ mandate to “loose the chains of injustice” (Isaiah 58:6) and fostering a vibrant gospel-centered witness in today’s inequitable world.

1. Confusion Between Biblical Justice and Secular Social Justice Ideologies

Many Christians disengage from moral, social, and equitable theology due to conflating biblical justice with secular social justice ideologies, such as those rooted in critical theory. This confusion breeds suspicion, viewing justice as a politicized agenda rather than a biblically-based, missional imperative. Biblically, justice (mishpat) demands fairness (Deuteronomy 16:20), but secular frameworks emphasizing outcome-based equity often clash with an evangelical focus on personal redemption. Neil Shenvi’s apologetics highlight how these ideologies sideline sin, alienating believers wary of cultural compromise. David Bosch’s Transforming Mission argues that mission requires social engagement, yet fear of syncretism—evident in historical fundamentalist-modernist divides—fosters inaction. Thabiti Anyabwile’s Statement on Social Justice warns against uncritical adoption, but overreaction risks abandoning the poor, contradicting Jesus’ ministry (Luke 4:18). Globally, this weakens witness, ignoring the Great Commission’s call to disciple nations (Matthew 28:19-20). Missional theology must reclaim justice as God’s character (Psalm 89:14), engaging culture prophetically without ideological capitulation. Without discernment, Christians forfeit shalom, leaving moral theology sidelined and the marginalized neglected.

2. Misconstruing Individual Salvation and Systemic Transformation as Separate Rather Than Intertwined

The missio Dei weaves individual salvation and systemic transformation as inseparable strands of God’s redemptive mission, yet many Christians treat them as an either-or, fostering unconcern for equitable theology. James 2:14-17 declares faith without works—caring for the needy—dead, showing personal faith and social action as one cord. Lesslie Newbigin’s The Gospel in a Pluralist Society critiques privatized piety that severs public witness, urging holistic mission. Prosperity gospels, per Kate Bowler’s Blessed, distort this unity, prioritizing personal gain over collective justice, contrary to Galatians 3:28’s vision of equity. David Gushee’s The Sacredness of Human Life traces this to Enlightenment individualism, which fragments theology into personal moralism. Globally, neglecting systemic exploitation, like urban poverty, ignores Isaiah 58:6-7’s call to break oppression’s yoke. Post-Reformation soteriology’s focus on forensic justification sometimes overshadowed sanctification’s social call, yet Miroslav Volf’s Exclusion and Embrace shows reconciliation demands both personal and structural change, reflecting Christ’s incarnation (Philippians 2:5-8). The Lima Declaration’s integral mission binds word and deed, urging believers to “seek the welfare of the city” (Jeremiah 29:7). Misconstruing these strands as separate weakens witness, perpetuating inequity. Embracing their unity empowers Christians to embody God’s shalom, transforming individuals and systems in one, gospel-centered, redemptive, word-deed action.

3. Influence of Prosperity Gospel and Materialistic Consumerism

Prosperity theology and consumerism divert Christians from equitable theology, equating divine favor with wealth and fostering apathy toward justice. Jesus warns against earthly treasures (Matthew 6:19-21), yet Allan Anderson’s An Introduction to Pentecostalism notes global pentecostalism’s focus on miracles over social concern. Consumerism, per Colleen McDannell’s Material Christianity, sacralizes accumulation, viewing poverty as personal failure. This inverts missional equity (Galatians 3:28), ignoring Leviticus 19:13’s wage justice. Miroslav Volf’s Work in the Spirit argues for transformative labor, not hoarding, aligning with stewardship for shalom (Genesis 1:28). Post-WWII affluence, per H. Richard Niebuhr’s Christ and Culture, shifted focus from prophetic critique to comfort. Globally, affluent Christians neglect inequities, as Samuel Escobar’s The New Global Mission observes. This unconcern erodes witness, prioritizing personal gain over sacrificial service. Reclaiming biblical economics—generosity as gospel fruit—restores missional fidelity, urging believers to champion the poor and dismantle exploitative systems through gospel-centered witness.

4. Theological Dualism Between Sacred and Secular Realms

Theological dualism—separating sacred and secular realms—breeds disengagement from moral, social, and equitable theology, confining Christian faith to private spheres and undermining its public witness. The incarnation in John 1:14, where “the Word became flesh,” obliterates this divide, demonstrating God’s redemptive engagement with all creation. Genesis 1:28 commands cultural stewardship, entrusting humanity with responsibility over the earth’s systems, yet pietism, as David Bosch critiques in Transforming Mission, reduced faith to personal devotion, sidelining societal transformation. This dualism, rooted in Platonic influences, as J. Richard Middleton notes in The Liberating Image, fragments theology into spiritual and material domains, devaluing justice as “worldly.” Amos 5:24 demands that justice “roll down like waters,” merging word and deed in a unified mission. Historically, post-Reformation pietism and evangelical individualism, per H. Richard Niebuhr’s Christ and Culture, entrenched this separation, absolving believers from confronting systemic sins like economic exploitation (James 5:1-6). Globally, this neglects contextual engagement, such as urban ministries addressing poverty or racial inequity, weakening the church’s incarnational presence. Ronald Sider’s Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger argues that biblical stewardship encompasses societal structures, not just personal piety. Missional renewal lies in embracing a unified theology where all work—personal and public—glorifies God (Colossians 3:17). Without this integration, missional efforts remain incomplete, failing to reflect God’s holistic mission of reconciliation and renewal (2 Corinthians 5:18-19). By rejecting dualism, Christians can transform apathy into active, justice-driven witness, fulfilling the gospel’s call to love neighbor and stranger alike, embodying shalom in every sphere of life.

5. Fear of Political Polarization and Cultural Compromise

Fear of political polarization deters Christians from social theology, viewing justice as partisan rather than prophetic. Jeremiah 22:3 calls for defending the oppressed, yet U.S. evangelicalism, per Michael Emerson’s Divided by Faith, equates equity with liberalism, fostering retreat. Stephen Bevans’ Models of Contextual Theology notes fear of compromise stifles contextual mission. Culture wars, per James Hunter’s To Change the World, amplify withdrawal, undermining the missio Dei. Globally, this neglects hospitality to strangers (Leviticus 19:34), weakening cross-cultural witness. Historically, fundamentalism’s social retreat, per George Marsden’s Fundamentalism and American Culture, entrenched this fear. Missional theology reframes politics as stewardship (Acts 4:19-20), urging courageous engagement. John Howard Yoder’s The Politics of Jesus insists nonviolence demands action, not silence. Overcoming fear through discernment restores prophetic integrity, aligning moral theology with kingdom witness, countering polarization’s paralyzing effect.

6. Historical Legacy of Christendom’s Compromise with Power Structures

Christendom’s alliance with power bred unconcern for equitable theology, normalizing injustice. Stanley Hauerwas’ The Peaceable Kingdom critiques how church-state fusion diluted prophetic critique. He argues the church’s alignment with empire, beginning with Constantine, muted its prophetic voice, embedding complicity with systems of oppression.  Jeremiah 29:7 urges seeking the city’s welfare, yet Constantine’s legacy, per William Cavanaugh’s Theopolitical Imagination, sacralized inequality. This fusion sanctified social hierarchies, contrary to the radical egalitarianism of Galatians 3:28. Colonial missions, while spreading the gospel, frequently served imperial agendas, as Lamin Sanneh’s Whose Religion Is Christianity? observes, marginalizing indigenous voices and perpetuating inequities. Biblically, jubilee (Leviticus 25) demands economic restoration, but historical quietism persists. The biblical call to care for the marginalized (Isaiah 58:6-7) demands active restoration, yet historical compromises have fostered a passive acceptance of injustice. Missional renewal requires prophetic distance, embodying counter-cultural shalom. However, the Christendom legacy fosters apathy, confusing loyalty, as John Howard Yoder notes. He advocates reclaiming a counter-cultural witness which requires the church to disentangle from worldly powers, embodying a kingdom ethic that prioritizes shalom and justice. This prophetic stance rekindles a vibrant social theology, centering equity as integral to Christian mission. In summary, reclaiming Anabaptist separation—embracing a distinct, non-conformist stance that prioritizes God’s kingdom over earthly powers—frees mission from imperial taint, invigorating social theology and restoring justice as central to Christian witness.

7. Lack of Theological Education and Formation in Missional Justice

The lack of robust theological education and formation in missional justice severely limits Christians’ ability to engage meaningfully with moral, social, and equitable theology, fostering a disconnect between faith and action. Edward Farley’s Theologia critiques seminaries for prioritizing abstract systematics over practical theology, sidelining the ethical imperatives of Matthew 28:20, which commands disciples to teach all that Christ instructed. Paul Hiebert’s Transforming Worldviews underscores how this educational gap hampers the church’s capacity to address contextual injustices, leaving believers ill-equipped to challenge systemic inequities, such as those condemned in Amos 5:24, where justice is urged to “roll on like a river.” The Enlightenment’s influence, as Friedrich Schleiermacher noted, further marginalized praxis, reducing theology to intellectual exercise rather than transformative engagement with the world. Richard Osmer’s Practical Theology advocates integrating theory and practice to form Christians who embody stewardship and justice, as urged in 1 Timothy 6:17-19, which calls the wealthy to generosity and good works. This educational shortfall perpetuates ignorance and apathy, orphaning justice from faith and weakening the church’s prophetic voice. Holistic formation, rooted in the Great Commandment to love God and neighbor (Matthew 22:37-40), equips believers to pursue equitable mission, fulfilling the biblical call to restore shalom in a broken world. By prioritizing theological education that bridges doctrine and action, the church can cultivate a kingdom-focused witness, empowering Christians to overcome indifference and actively address moral and social inequities, embodying transformative justice as a central expression of their faith.

Conclusion

Unconcern for moral, social, and equitable theology reflects theological fractures that weaken the believer’s missional witness. Scripture’s call—“let justice roll down like waters” (Amos 5:24)—exposes apathy as antithetical to God’s reconciling mission. Historical compromises, ideological fears, and educational gaps, critiqued by Bosch and Volf, fragment faith, but missiology offers renewal through integral mission. By heeding scholars like Baucham and Gushee, Christians can transcend individualism, embodying Christ’s mission to the poor (Luke 4:18-19). This shift revitalizes witness, fostering communities of justice and hospitality. Embracing these theological perspectives fulfills the missio Dei, transforming unconcern into urgent, faithful action—where justice, mercy, and faithfulness converge (Micah 6:8)—for a just world.

Sources

• Anderson, Allan. An Introduction to Pentecostalism: Global Charismatic Christianity. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
• Anyabwile, Thabiti. Foreword to The Statement on Social Justice and the Gospel. Founders Ministries, 2018.
• Baucham, Voddie. Fault Lines: The Social Justice Movement and Evangelicalism’s Looming Catastrophe. Salem Books, 2021.
• Bevans, Stephen B. Models of Contextual Theology. Orbis Books, 2002.
• Bosch, David J. Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission. Orbis Books, 1991.
• Bowler, Kate. Blessed: A History of the American Prosperity Gospel. Oxford University Press, 2013.
• Cavanaugh, William T. Theopolitical Imagination: Discovering the Liturgy as a Political Act in an Age of Global Consumerism. T&T Clark, 2002.
• Emerson, Michael O., and Christian Smith. Divided by Faith: Evangelical Religion and the Problem of Race in America. Oxford University Press, 2000.
• Escobar, Samuel. The New Global Mission: The Gospel from Everywhere to Everyone. InterVarsity Press, 2003.
• Farley, Edward. Theologia: The Fragmentation and Unity of Theological Education. Fortress Press, 1983.
• Gushee, David P. The Sacredness of Human Life. Eerdmans, 2013.
• Hauerwas, Stanley. The Peaceable Kingdom: A Primer in Christian Ethics. University of Notre Dame Press, 1983.
• Hiebert, Paul G. Transforming Worldviews: An Anthropological Understanding of How People Change. Baker Academic, 2008.
• Hunter, James Davison. To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World. Oxford University Press, 2010.
• Marsden, George M. Fundamentalism and American Culture. Oxford University Press, 1980.
• McDannell, Colleen. Material Christianity: Religion and Popular Culture in America. Yale University Press, 1995.
• Middleton, J. Richard. The Liberating Image: The Imago Dei in an Age of Anxiety. Brazos Press, 2005.
• Newbigin, Lesslie. The Gospel in a Pluralist Society. Eerdmans, 1989.
• Niebuhr, H. Richard. Christ and Culture. Harper & Row, 1951.
• Osmer, Richard R. Practical Theology: An Introduction. Eerdmans, 2008.
• Sanneh, Lamin. Whose Religion Is Christianity? The Gospel Beyond the West. Eerdmans, 2003.
• Shenvi, Neil. “Christianity and Social Justice.” Shenvi Apologetics, 2020. https://shenviapologetics.com/christianity-and-social-justice/.
• Sider, Ronald J. Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger: Moving from Affluence to Generosity. Thomas Nelson, 2005.
• Volf, Miroslav. Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation. Abingdon Press, 1996.
• Volf, Miroslav. Work in the Spirit: Toward a Theology of Work. Oxford University Press, 1991.
• Wright, Christopher J.H. Old Testament Ethics for the People of God. InterVarsity Press, 2004.
• Yoder, John Howard. The Politics of Jesus: Vicit Agnus Noster. Eerdmans, 1972.

Curt Watke, PhD

Dr. Curt Watke is a distinguished missiologist whose three-plus-decade-long career has significantly impacted Christian mission work in North America, particularly in under-reached and challenging regions. Holding a Ph.D. in Evangelism and Missions, Dr. Watke has focused on bridging cultural gaps and fostering sustainable Christian communities by developing innovative strategies that address contemporary challenges like globalization, urbanization, and religious pluralism. His emphasis on cultural sensitivity and contextualization in mission work is reflected in his collaborative writings, including notable works such as “Ministry Context Exploration: Understanding North American Cultures” and “Starting Reproducing Congregations.” Beyond his writing, Dr. Watke is a sought-after speaker and educator, lecturing at seminaries and conferences worldwide, and his teachings continue to inspire and equip new generations of missional leaders. His enduring legacy is marked by unwavering dedication to the mission of God and a profound influence on missional thought and practice.  Dr. Watke serves as President and Professor of Evangelism & Missiology at Missional University.