Understanding Origins and Destiny in Christian Witness

In an age marked by existential searching and spiritual hunger, few questions resonate more deeply with the human heart than these: Where did we come from? What is our purpose? Where are we going? These are not merely philosophical musings but foundational worldview questions that shape how individuals understand reality, make moral decisions, and orient their lives. For those engaged in conversational Christian witness, understanding how the biblical narrative addresses origins and destiny provides a powerful framework for meaningful spiritual dialogue across diverse cultural contexts.

The exploration of worldview in Christian witness begins with recognizing that every person carries within them fundamental assumptions about human origin and ultimate destiny. These assumptions profoundly influence how they interpret their experiences, relationships, and spiritual longings. When we learn to ask thoughtful questions that reveal these deep-seated beliefs, we create opportunities for authentic gospel conversations that honor the dignity of others while faithfully presenting the Christian message.

 

The Biblical Foundation: Created with Purpose

The biblical narrative opens with a profound declaration that directly addresses the question of human origins. Genesis 1-2 presents humanity as uniquely created in the image of God—the imago Dei. This foundational truth establishes that human beings are not cosmic accidents, products of blind evolutionary processes, or merely advanced animals. Rather, humanity bears the distinct mark of intentional divine design.

When Genesis 1:27 declares that God created humanity “in his own image,” it establishes several crucial realities. First, every person possesses inherent dignity and worth regardless of their abilities, achievements, race, ethnicity, social standing or country of origin. The imago Dei is not earned through moral performance or intellectual capacity but is a gift embedded in our very nature as human beings. Second, humanity was created for relationship—both with God and with one another. The relational capacity we possess reflects the relational nature of the Triune God Himself.

This concept of bearing God’s image carries profound implications for conversational witness. When we engage in spiritual conversations, we are speaking with image-bearers of the Creator, individuals who possess an inherent capacity for relationship with God and who carry an inbuilt longing for transcendent purpose. Understanding this transforms how we approach evangelistic conversations. We are not imposing meaning on meaningless beings but awakening people to the reality of their designed purpose.

The creation narrative also reveals that humanity was given what theologians call the “cultural mandate”—a calling to be co-creators with God in cultivating and developing the created world. Genesis 1:28 commissions humanity to be fruitful, multiply, and exercise stewardship over creation. This mandate establishes that human work and creativity are not secular activities divorced from spiritual significance but are expressions of our image-bearing nature and participation in God’s ongoing creative purposes.

 

The Disruption: How the Fall Altered Destiny

The Genesis 3 account of the Fall introduces a critical dimension to understanding human origins and destiny. While humanity was created with purpose and in perfect relationship with God, rebellion against the Creator introduced a fundamental disruption. The Fall did not erase the imago Dei, but it profoundly marred it. Death, separation from God, relational brokenness, and spiritual alienation entered human experience.

This narrative of disruption explains the universal human experience of longing for something more, the persistent sense that the world is not as it should be. Every culture’s awareness of moral failure, every individual’s experience of guilt and shame, every person’s intuition that death is an enemy rather than a natural conclusion—these universal human experiences point to the reality that our current condition is not our intended state.

Understanding the Fall is essential for conversational witness because it provides a framework for discussing the human predicament without diminishing human dignity. The Christian message acknowledges that humanity is fallen but not worthless, broken but not beyond repair. We are simultaneously bearers of God’s image and rebels against His rule. This paradox explains both the nobility and the depravity observable in human behavior.

Significantly, Genesis 3:15 introduces what theologians call the protoevangelium—the first hint of the gospel. Even in pronouncing judgment, God promises that the offspring of the woman will crush the serpent’s head. This ancient promise reveals that God’s response to human rebellion is not abandonment but a redemptive mission that will ultimately restore humanity to its intended destiny.

 

The Incarnation: God Redirecting Human Destiny

The Gospel of John opens with a cosmic declaration that bridges creation and redemption: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God… And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:1, 14). The Incarnation represents God’s decisive intervention to redirect human destiny.

In Jesus Christ, we see both the perfect image of God and the perfect human being. As Colossians 1:15 declares, “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.” Christ embodies what humanity was always meant to be—living in unbroken fellowship with the Father, perfectly fulfilling the cultural mandate, and demonstrating what it looks like to bear God’s image without the distortion of sin.

The Incarnation reveals that human destiny is not fatalistic or predetermined in a way that removes human agency. Rather, destiny becomes participatory through relationship with Christ. This is revolutionary for conversational witness because it means that individuals are not trapped in their current spiritual state. Through faith in Christ, people can enter into the redemptive narrative and begin experiencing the restoration of their intended purpose.

Christ’s death and resurrection accomplish what humanity could never achieve on its own—the reconciliation of rebels to their Creator. The cross addresses the guilt and penalty of sin, while the resurrection demonstrates God’s power to bring new life from death. For those engaged in spiritual conversations, these historical events provide concrete answers to humanity’s deepest problems while pointing toward ultimate hope.

 

The Ultimate Restoration: New Creation and Final Destiny

The biblical narrative culminates not with souls floating on clouds but with the vision presented in Revelation 21-22 of “a new heaven and a new earth.” This eschatological hope reveals that God’s ultimate plan is the comprehensive renewal of all creation. The Greek word kainos used to describe this new creation indicates something that is not merely brand new but renewed and transformed—maintaining continuity with the old while being qualitatively different.

This vision of new creation addresses the question of destiny with stunning clarity. Human beings are not destined for disembodied existence in some ethereal heaven but for resurrected life in a renewed physical creation. The “already but not yet” tension of inaugurated eschatology means that followers of Christ experience foretastes of this future reality even now through the Holy Spirit’s transforming work.

The new creation will be characterized by the restoration of all that was lost in the Fall and the fulfillment of all that was promised in creation. Revelation 21:3-4 describes a reality where “God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.” This is not escapism but the fulfillment of God’s original creative intent.

Understanding this comprehensive vision of restoration provides powerful motivation for present-day witness. When we invite people into relationship with Christ, we are not merely offering fire insurance from hell but extending an invitation to participate in God’s grand narrative of cosmic renewal. We are calling people to find their place in the story that stretches from creation to new creation.

 

Connecting to Systematic Theology

The themes of origins and destiny connect directly to central doctrines in systematic theology. Within theology proper (the doctrine of God), we encounter God as Creator, Sustainer, and Consummator. The same God who spoke creation into existence through His Word continues to uphold it moment by moment and will bring it to its intended completion.

Protology, the doctrine of first things, establishes the theological foundation for understanding creation ex nihilo—God’s creation of all things from nothing. This doctrine affirms God’s absolute sovereignty and the contingent nature of all created reality. Creation is not an emanation from God’s being or the result of divine struggle but the free expression of God’s will and creative power.

Eschatology, the doctrine of last things, completes the arc begun in protology. Christian eschatology encompasses not just individual destiny but the destiny of all creation. It includes the doctrines of resurrection, final judgment, and the establishment of the new heavens and new earth. The theological integration of protology and eschatology reveals that the same God who initiated creation will complete it, ensuring a purposeful trajectory for all of history.

This theological framework demonstrates internal coherence that stands in stark contrast to worldviews that separate origins from destiny or that view existence as ultimately meaningless. The Christian worldview presents a unified narrative where humanity’s origin in God’s creative purpose connects seamlessly to humanity’s destiny in restored creation.

 

The Missio Dei Framework

Understanding origins and destiny within the missio Dei—the mission of God—transforms how we approach evangelistic conversations. The concept of missio Dei, which gained prominence at the 1952 Willingen missionary conference, recognizes that mission originates not in human initiative but in God’s very nature as a sending God.

The missio Dei operates through what theologians call the “missional narrative arc” that spans from creation to consummation. This arc includes several key components. First, there is the creation mission, embodied in the cultural mandate of Genesis 1:28, where humans are commissioned as co-creators with God in cultivating and developing His creation. This establishes that human work and cultural engagement have missional significance.

Second, there is the eschatological mission, which involves living toward the reality of new creation even in the present. This is what theologians call proleptic witness—bearing testimony now to the future reality that God has promised. When Christians engage in peacemaking, pursue justice, care for creation, and demonstrate reconciliation, they are offering previews of the coming kingdom.

Third, narrative missiology invites people into God’s grand story rather than merely presenting propositional truths divorced from narrative context. When engaging in conversational witness, we help individuals see how their personal story can find its true meaning and fulfillment within God’s larger story of redemption from creation to new creation.

This missiological framework reveals that Christian witness is not about extracting individuals from the world but about inviting them to participate in God’s mission to renew all things. The Great Commission of Matthew 28:18-20 is not an isolated command but an integral part of God’s ongoing work to restore creation and reconcile all things to Himself through Christ.

 

Divine Action and Human Response

Understanding origins and destiny from a biblical perspective requires examining both divine action and typical human responses that reject or distort this truth. God’s creative and consummating action includes several key elements that provide the foundation for conversational witness.

First, there is creatio ex nihilo—God’s creation from nothing as declared in Genesis 1:1. This establishes that all reality is contingent upon God and that He is the ultimate source of all existence. Second, there is sustaining providence, revealed in passages like Colossians 1:17, which declares that in Christ “all things hold together.” This means that creation is not a one-time event but an ongoing reality sustained by God’s continuous power.

Third, there is eschatological fulfillment—God’s promise to bring history to purposeful completion as depicted in Revelation 21-22. This ensures that history is not cyclical or random but moving toward a definite goal established by God. Fourth, there is incarnational intervention—God’s entrance into creation through the Incarnation to redirect human destiny, as proclaimed in John 1:14.

In contrast to these divine actions, humanity has responded in various ways that reject or distort the truth about origins and destiny. Naturalism rejects purposeful origin, attributing human existence to chance processes or natural selection operating without divine guidance. Naturalism denies any transcendent purpose or design.

Materialism denies transcendent destiny, insisting that death ends individual existence and that there is no reality beyond the physical. This worldview reduces human beings to complex arrangements of matter without intrinsic value or ultimate significance. Eastern cyclical views reject linear history, viewing time as endless repetition without progress toward a final goal. This worldview sees ultimate salvation as escape from the cycle of existence rather than fulfillment of created purpose.

Existential despair acknowledges meaninglessness without divine telos, resonating with the book of Ecclesiastes when read apart from its grounding in God. This perspective recognizes the apparent absurdity of existence but offers no transcendent solution. Finally, self-constructed meaning represents humanity’s attempt to create purpose independent of the Creator, echoing the Tower of Babel motif where humans seek to establish significance through their own efforts rather than finding it in relationship with God.

 

Presuppositional Apologetics and the Question of Origins and Destiny

The questions of origins and destiny are not merely academic matters but foundational presuppositions that shape how individuals interpret all of reality. This is where presuppositional apologetics provides a powerful framework for conversational witness. Developed primarily by Reformed theologian Cornelius Van Til in the mid-twentieth century, presuppositional apologetics recognizes that worldviews are not constructed from neutral facts but are built upon foundational assumptions about ultimate reality.

Van Til famously stated that “the only proof for the existence of God is that without God you couldn’t prove anything.” This provocative assertion highlights a crucial insight: questions about human origins and destiny are not peripheral issues that can be resolved after first establishing some neutral common ground. Rather, they are the foundational presuppositions that determine how one interprets every fact, every experience, and every argument.

The Impossibility of Neutrality

One of the key insights of presuppositional apologetics is that there is no neutral standpoint from which to evaluate competing truth claims about origins and destiny. Every person approaches these questions with prior commitments that shape their interpretation of evidence. As presuppositionalist Greg Bahnsen explained, facts do not interpret themselves—they are always interpreted within a worldview framework.

This has profound implications for how we engage in spiritual conversations about origins and destiny. When someone claims that humanity originated through purely naturalistic evolutionary processes, they are not simply following the evidence where it leads. They are interpreting the evidence through the presupposition that no divine agency exists or is necessary. Similarly, when someone denies any transcendent destiny beyond death, they are operating from the presupposition that material reality is all that exists.

The Christian worldview, by contrast, begins with the presupposition that the Triune God exists, has revealed Himself in Scripture, and has created humanity with purpose and for an ultimate destiny. This is not a weakness but an honest acknowledgment that all thinking must begin somewhere. The question is not whether we have presuppositions but whether our presuppositions are true and whether they provide a coherent foundation for making sense of reality.

The Preconditions of Intelligibility

Presuppositional apologetics asks a penetrating question: What must be true about reality for human knowledge, morality, logic, and science to be possible? This approach, often called transcendental argumentation, demonstrates that the Christian worldview provides the necessary preconditions for intelligibility while alternative worldviews cannot account for these fundamental aspects of human experience.

Consider how this applies to origins and destiny. If humanity truly originated through random, purposeless natural processes, on what basis can we trust our cognitive faculties to deliver true beliefs? Natural selection favors survival, not truth. Yet we rely on our reasoning abilities in every conversation, including conversations about origins. The Christian understanding that humanity bears God’s image and was designed with cognitive capacities for truth provides a coherent foundation for trusting human reason.

Similarly, if there is no transcendent destiny and death is the absolute end of existence, on what basis do we ground universal human dignity, moral obligations, or the pursuit of justice? Why should we care about truth at all if our existence is ultimately meaningless? The naturalistic worldview borrowed concepts like human value and moral obligation from the Christian framework while denying the metaphysical foundation that makes these concepts coherent.

Internal Critique of Alternative Worldviews

Presuppositional apologetics employs what is called an “internal critique” of non-Christian worldviews. This involves examining whether alternative explanations of origins and destiny can consistently account for the realities we all experience. When engaged in conversational witness, this approach invites people to consider whether their worldview can adequately explain what they already know to be true.

For example, when speaking with someone who holds to philosophical naturalism, we can ask: “If humans are merely the products of matter plus time plus chance, why do you experience an undeniable sense of purpose and meaning? Why does the universe appear to be governed by rational, discoverable laws rather than chaos? Why do you make moral judgments as if moral truths are objective rather than merely subjective preferences?” These questions expose the gap between what naturalism can logically provide and what humans universally experience.

The biblical narrative of origins and destiny, by contrast, makes sense of these universal human experiences. Purpose is real because we were designed with purpose. The universe is rationally ordered because it was created by a rational God. Moral truths are objective because they reflect the character of the moral Lawgiver. Human dignity is inviolable because humans bear God’s image. The longing for something beyond death is valid because we were created for eternal relationship with God.

Avoiding the Autonomous Reason Trap

Classical and evidential apologetics often attempt to establish common ground by appealing to autonomous human reason as the ultimate arbiter of truth. The presuppositional approach recognizes this as problematic because it effectively places human reason above divine revelation. It invites the unbeliever to sit in judgment over God’s Word rather than submitting to God’s self-disclosure.

In conversations about origins and destiny, this distinction becomes critical. We are not asking people to evaluate whether the biblical account of creation is plausible according to their existing framework. Rather, we are inviting them to recognize that their framework itself is inadequate and that the biblical worldview provides the only coherent foundation for understanding reality.

This does not mean we ignore evidence or refuse to discuss scientific discoveries, historical facts, or logical arguments. Rather, it means we recognize that all evidence is interpreted within a worldview framework, and we seek to demonstrate that the Christian framework makes better sense of the total evidence than alternatives. We show that naturalistic explanations of origins cannot account for the existence of consciousness, moral awareness, rationality, and universal human longings for transcendence.

Practical Application in Spiritual Conversations

How does presuppositional apologetics work in actual conversations about origins and destiny? It begins by listening carefully to understand what presuppositions are shaping the other person’s thinking. When someone expresses skepticism about God or claims that humans are merely evolved animals, we can respond by exploring the implications of that worldview.

We might ask: “If that’s true, what would that mean for the concepts of human rights, justice, or love that you still hold to?” “If humans are just biological machines shaped by evolution, why do you experience guilt, shame, or moral obligation?” “If there is no purpose to existence, why do you seek meaning in your relationships, your work, or your aspirations?”

These questions are not meant as gotcha moments but as gentle invitations to examine whether their stated worldview can support the values and experiences they actually live by. Often, people live as if the Christian worldview is true even while verbally denying it. Presuppositional apologetics helps them see this inconsistency and consider whether the biblical narrative might actually be true.

We can then present the Christian account of origins and destiny not as one hypothesis among many but as the necessary framework for making sense of reality. We show how the biblical teaching that humans are created in God’s image explains why we have inherent dignity and worth. We demonstrate how the promise of new creation gives coherent hope in the face of death. We reveal how God’s entrance into creation through the Incarnation addresses the problem of evil and suffering that every worldview must grapple with.

Connecting Presuppositionalism to Conversational Witness

The presuppositional approach aligns beautifully with the conversational witness methodology emphasized in worldview study. Both recognize that effective witness involves asking excellent questions that reveal worldview assumptions rather than simply presenting information. Both understand that changing minds requires changing the foundational framework through which people interpret reality.

When we ask someone, “What do you believe about where we came from and where we’re going?” we are not just gathering information for a tailored gospel presentation. We are inviting them to articulate and examine the presuppositions that govern how they understand themselves and the world. As the conversation unfolds, we can gently expose the inadequacies of their framework while demonstrating the comprehensiveness and coherence of the biblical worldview.

This approach requires humility, patience, and genuine love for the person we’re speaking with. We are not trying to win arguments but to help people see the truth. We acknowledge our own need for God’s revelation because we recognize that apart from His self-disclosure, we would be as lost in our understanding as anyone else. We present the Christian worldview not as our personal opinion but as the reality that makes all human experience intelligible.

The Role of the Holy Spirit

Presuppositional apologetics maintains that ultimately, no argument alone can bring someone to faith. As 1 Corinthians 2:14 teaches, “The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.” This means that conversational witness about origins and destiny must always be accompanied by prayer and dependence on the Holy Spirit to open blind eyes and soften hard hearts.

This theological realism prevents both arrogance and despair in evangelistic conversations. We recognize that we are not responsible for converting anyone—that is God’s work. Our responsibility is to be faithful witnesses who present the truth with clarity and compassion, asking good questions that expose worldview assumptions and demonstrating the superiority of the Christian framework. We trust that the Holy Spirit works through faithful witness to bring about the miracle of regeneration.

The presuppositional approach also reminds us that evidence and arguments, while important, are not the ultimate issue. The ultimate issue is whether someone will acknowledge God’s existence, submit to His lordship, and accept His revelation about origins and destiny. This keeps our conversations focused on the heart rather than merely the intellect, recognizing that worldview commitments are ultimately matters of worship—we either worship the Creator or some aspect of creation.

 

Practical Application in Conversational Witness

How does this theological framework translate into actual conversational witness? The key lies in asking questions that reveal worldview assumptions about origins and destiny, then demonstrating how the biblical narrative addresses these fundamental human concerns more comprehensively than alternative worldviews.

Begin conversations by asking questions like: “Where do you think humanity came from?” “What do you think happens after we die?” These questions invite people to articulate their existing worldview assumptions rather than immediately confronting them with biblical answers.

Listen carefully for how people’s answers reveal their underlying beliefs about origins and destiny. When someone expresses that life seems meaningless or purposeless, this creates an opportunity to explore how the Christian narrative addresses that existential hunger. When someone attributes human existence to purely natural processes, you can ask how they account for the universal human longing for transcendence and purpose.

Present the biblical narrative not as abstract propositions but as a story that makes sense of universal human experiences. Point out how the imago Dei explains both human dignity and human depravity. Show how the Fall accounts for the brokenness we all experience. Demonstrate how the Incarnation reveals God’s commitment to redemption rather than abandonment. Paint the picture of new creation as the fulfillment of humanity’s deepest longings rather than wishful thinking.

Connect personal destiny to cosmic destiny. Help individuals understand that their personal life story can find meaning within God’s larger redemptive narrative. When people grasp that they were created with purpose, that their current brokenness is not their final state, and that God offers them a destiny of restored relationship and renewed creation, the gospel becomes compellingly relevant.

Address common objections with grace and wisdom. When people object that they cannot accept creation because of scientific evidence for evolution, explore whether the real issue is about mechanisms of creation or whether the universe has purpose and design. When people dismiss eschatological hope as escapism, show how Christian eschatology actually affirms the goodness of physical creation and motivates present engagement with the world.

 

Living Out the Implications

Understanding origins and destiny in the biblical framework should transform not only our evangelistic conversations but our entire way of living. If we truly believe that humanity bears God’s image and is destined for resurrected life in new creation, this should shape how we treat every person we encounter, how we steward creation, and how we orient our daily lives.

Recognizing that every person is an image-bearer should cultivate profound respect even for those who reject or oppose the gospel. It should motivate us toward justice for the oppressed, advocacy for the vulnerable, and compassion for the broken. Our witness becomes more than words when our lives demonstrate the dignity we believe every human possesses.

Understanding that creation is destined for renewal rather than destruction should inform our approach to environmental stewardship, cultural engagement, and vocation. Work is not merely a means of survival or self-fulfillment but participation in God’s creative purposes. Cultural products—art, music, literature, technology—are not secular diversions but expressions of our image-bearing creativity.

The eschatological hope of new creation should free us from both despair and naive optimism. We are not crushed by the world’s brokenness because we know redemption is coming. Neither are we surprised by ongoing evil because we understand that the full consummation awaits Christ’s return. This hope enables realistic engagement with the world’s problems while maintaining joyful confidence in God’s ultimate victory.

 

The Ultimate Invitation

At its core, the message about origins and destiny is an invitation. It is an invitation to recognize that you are not an accident but a purposefully designed image-bearer of the Creator. It is an invitation to acknowledge that your current experience of brokenness, alienation, and mortality is not your intended state. It is an invitation to enter into relationship with Christ and begin experiencing the restoration of your created purpose even now. It is an invitation to find your place in God’s grand narrative that stretches from creation to new creation.

This invitation does not promise escape from present difficulties or immediate transformation of all circumstances. What it offers is infinitely greater—a fundamental reorientation of identity, purpose, and destiny rooted in the unchanging character of God and His revealed plan for creation. It offers the only worldview that accounts comprehensively for both human dignity and human depravity, both present suffering and future glory, both individual significance and cosmic purpose.

As individuals engaged in conversational witness, our calling is to extend this invitation with clarity, compassion, and confidence. We do so not as those who have achieved moral perfection but as fellow image-bearers who have discovered the Source of our purpose and the Goal of our existence. We invite others to join us in the journey of being transformed from glory to glory until the day when God’s original creative intent is fully realized in new creation.

 

Conclusion

The questions of origins and destiny are not peripheral concerns but central to human existence and worldview formation. The biblical narrative provides a comprehensive framework that addresses these questions with intellectual coherence and existential power. Understanding this framework equips us for meaningful conversational witness that engages people at the deepest level of their spiritual hunger.

When we grasp how the themes of creation, fall, redemption, and new creation form a unified narrative arc grounded in the missio Dei, we discover that evangelism is not about winning arguments but about inviting people into relationship with the God who created them with purpose and offers them a destiny beyond their wildest imagination. We proclaim that humanity’s origin in God’s creative purpose and destiny in restored creation provides the only adequate foundation for meaning, morality, and hope.

This message is desperately needed in our fragmented, anxious, and searching world. As we engage in conversations about faith, may we do so with the confidence that the biblical worldview truly does make the best sense of reality and human experience. May we ask excellent questions that reveal worldview assumptions. May we listen with genuine empathy to the struggles and longings of those we encounter. And may we faithfully present the gospel as the comprehensive answer to humanity’s deepest questions about where we came from, why we are here, and where we are going.

 

Sources

• Bahnsen, Greg L. Van Til’s Apologetic: Readings and Analysis. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed, 1998.
• Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics. Translated by G. W. Bromiley and T. F. Torrance. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1956-1975.
• Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics, Volume 2: God and Creation. Edited by John Bolt. Translated by John Vriend. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2004.
• Berkouwer, G. C. Man: The Image of God. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1962.
• Bosch, David J. Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1991.
• Brunner, Emil. Man in Revolt: A Christian Anthropology. Translated by Olive Wyon. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1947.
• English Standard Version Bible. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2001
• Flett, John G. The Witness of God: The Trinity, Missio Dei, Karl Barth, and the Nature of Christian Community. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.
• Frame, John M. Apologetics to the Glory of God: An Introduction. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed, 1994.
• Frame, John M. Cornelius Van Til: An Analysis of His Thought. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed, 1995.
• Gentry, Peter J. “The Covenant with Creation in Genesis 1–3.” In God’s Kingdom Through God’s Covenants: A Concise Biblical Theology, edited by Peter J. Gentry and Stephen J. Wellum. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2015.
• Grenz, Stanley J. The Social God and the Relational Self: A Trinitarian Theology of the Imago Dei. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.
• Guder, Darrell L., ed. Missional Church: A Vision for the Sending of the Church in North America. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.
• Hefner, Philip. The Human Factor: Evolution, Culture, and Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.
• Hoekema, Anthony A. Created in God’s Image. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994.
• Middleton, J. Richard. A New Heaven and a New Earth: Reclaiming Biblical Eschatology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2014.
• Moo, Douglas J. “Nature in the New Creation: New Testament Eschatology and the Environment.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 49, no. 3 (2006): 449-488.
• Threlfall, David L. “The Doctrine of the Imago Dei: The Biblical Data for an Abductive Argument for the Christian Faith.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 62, no. 3 (2019): 543-561.
• Van Til, Cornelius. The Defense of the Faith. 4th ed. Edited by K. Scott Oliphint. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed, 2008.
• Wright, Christopher J. H. The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible’s Grand Narrative. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2006.
• Wright, N. T. Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church. New York: HarperOne, 2008.
• Yong, Amos. The Missiological Spirit: Christian Mission Theology in the Third Millennium Global Context. James Clarke , 2015.