Missional Loft

Resources for Integrating Faith, Life & Mission

Dismantling Interconnected Confederacies of Evil in Communities

Confronting Organized Sin in a Fragmented World

The Godfather is a landmark 1972 American crime film directed by Francis Ford Coppola, based on Mario Puzo’s novel of the same name. Set in the late 1940s, the story follows the powerful and secretive Corleone mafia family, led by patriarch Vito Corleone, played by Marlon Brando. As Vito tries to secure a peaceful legacy, tensions rise within the criminal underworld, leading to betrayal, violence, and the eventual rise of his youngest son, Michael, portrayed by Al Pacino, from reluctant outsider to ruthless leader. The film is renowned for its exploration of power, loyalty, family, and the corrupting influence of violence. It offers a stark, stylized depiction of criminal enterprises as deeply hierarchical, culturally coded institutions that blur the lines between honor and brutality, business and bloodshed.

But there is more to it than that.

While movie viewers are fascinated by the depiction of a mafia world unknown to them, the reality is much closer than they realize. Deviant organizations and social structures that exert a corruptive and corrosive influence on society often operate under the guise of legitimacy while undermining ethical, biblical norms, justice, and social cohesion. These can include organized crime syndicates, corrupt political regimes, exploitative corporations, extremist groups, and even certain religious cults that manipulate belief for control or profit. Such structures typically rely on fear, coercion, manipulation, or systemic inequality to maintain power and influence. They erode trust in institutions, perpetuate cycles of poverty and violence, and often entrench discrimination or marginalization. By prioritizing self-interest, profit, or ideological domination over communal well-being and fairness, these deviant systems weaken the moral fabric of society and obstruct efforts toward equity, transparency, and social justice.

We call them “confederacies of evil” — interlocking systems that perpetuate injustice and spiritual alienation. The term “systemic sin” refers to the corruption, deviance, or dysfunction that is deeply embedded within the structures, institutions, and operations of a society or organization. Rather than being isolated incidents or the actions of a few individuals, systemic issues are widespread, recurring, and sustained by the very rules, norms, or power dynamics of the structure itself. These confederacies of evil operate across cultural, economic, and social boundaries, creating structures that entrench suffering and separation from God’s design for human flourishing. As participants in God’s redemptive mission, how do we effectively recognize and dismantle these confederacies of evil while offering authentic hope through Christ to the people who are caught up in these systems?

 

The Corporate Nature of Sin: Beyond Personal Morality

Sin is more than individual moral failures—it constitutes vast, interconnected systems that operate at both personal and structural levels. Scripture consistently portrays sin not merely as isolated acts but as powerful, coordinated forces that resist God’s redemptive purposes.

The Interlocking Architecture of Evil

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20)

Sin operates through what can be described as an “ecology of evil”—a complex web of mutual reinforcement where various expressions of rebellion against God’s design support and strengthen one another. For example, economic exploitation fuels poverty, which deepens despair, which can intensify addiction, which strengthens materialism—creating cycles of sin that resist piecemeal solutions.

The Apostle Paul’s concept of the “body of sin” (Romans 6:6 – in contrast to the “mortal body” in vs 12) suggests this corporate, interconnected nature. Sin isn’t merely a collection of individual wrongdoings but a cooperative enterprise where various expressions of rebellion work together to sustain structures of corruption.

Structural Dimensions of Sin

Does God pervert justice? Or does the Almighty pervert what is right? If your children have sinned against him, he has delivered them into the hand of their transgression.” (Job 8:3-4)

Sin manifests not only in personal moral failures but also becomes embedded in systems, structures, and institutional patterns. These structures—economic, political, social, and religious—create environments that normalize sin and make righteous living exceptionally difficult. This structural dimension is included in the world forces of this darkness” that Paul references in Ephesians 6:12.

Consider how systemic racism, economic exploitation, and environmental degradation operate as interconnected systems that perpetuate injustice. These aren’t merely the sum of individual racist attitudes or exploitative actions but become embedded in cultural narratives, legal frameworks, and economic structures that develop their own momentum.

Cultural Captivity and Corporate Idolatry

The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?” (Jeremiah 17:9)

Entire cultures can become captive to particular configurations of sin, developing intellectual frameworks, moral justifications, and social practices that normalize specific patterns of evil while rendering them nearly invisible to those within the culture. This “cultural captivity” creates blind spots where certain sins become structurally reinforced and protected from critique.

Communities and societies develop shared idols—ultimate objects of trust and devotion that displace God. These corporate idols (wealth, power, security, pleasure) shape collective desires and behaviors, creating shared patterns of sin that define cultural identities. As the prophet Jeremiah warned, “They have built the high places of Baal to burn their children in the fire as offerings to Baal—something I did not command or mention, nor did it enter my mind” (Jeremiah 19:5).

 

Redemptive Care as Participation in God’s Mission

In confronting these confederacies of evil, we participate in God’s redemptive mission (missio Dei) through what can be called “Redemptive Care”—a holistic approach that views caregiving as participation in God’s work to restore all creation.

Understanding Redemptive Care

For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” (Ephesians 2:10)

Redemptive Care combines service with the recognition that care has transformative potential—not just addressing immediate needs but contributing to the restoration and healing of individuals, communities, and creation itself. This care flows from understanding that God’s mission is comprehensive, addressing every dimension of human brokenness and the organized systems that perpetuate it.

Unlike simplistic charity that may inadvertently reinforce unjust structures, Redemptive Care seeks to address root causes while maintaining the dignity of those being served. It recognizes that genuine transformation requires addressing both immediate needs and the systemic conditions that create vulnerability.

The Intercultural Dimension of Redemptive Care

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)

Redemptive Care must navigate cultural differences with humility and wisdom. Different cultures experience and express brokenness in unique ways:

  • Shame-based cultures may experience spiritual brokenness primarily as honor violation
  • Guilt-based cultures may experience it as moral transgression
  • Collectivist cultures understand the soul more communally than individually
  • Historical traumas and colonial legacies create collective spiritual wounds requiring specific approaches

Effective Redemptive Care requires cultural humility—recognizing that no single cultural expression of Christianity possesses complete moral vision. Each culture tends to recognize certain sins clearly while remaining blind to others. Intercultural dialogue becomes essential for developing a more complete understanding of how sin operates systemically across contexts.

The Interplay of Word and Deed

Little children, let us not love in word or talk but in deed and in truth.” (1 John 3:18)

Authentic Redemptive Care recognizes that acts of service and verbal proclamation of the gospel are not competing alternatives but complementary expressions of the same mission. The verbal sharing of the salvation message through Jesus Christ gives ultimate meaning and context to acts of care.

This unity of word and deed reflects the incarnational pattern of Jesus, who both proclaimed the Kingdom of God and demonstrated its reality through healing, deliverance, and restoration. Without this integration, our efforts risk becoming either mere humanitarianism lacking spiritual transformation or disembodied proclamation disconnected from tangible needs.

 

Confronting Organized Sin: Practical Approaches

Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.” (Isaiah 1:17)

How do we practically confront these confederacies of evil? Several approaches emerge from the scripture:

Discernment of Organized Community Sinfulness

But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.” (Hebrews 5:14)

Redemptive Care must develop capacities for discerning not just individual moral failures but the organized patterns that sustain confederacies of sin in communities and cultures. This requires:

  • Developing “structural literacy”—the ability to recognize how systems perpetuate injustice
  • Cultivating historical awareness that connects present injustices to their root causes
  • Practicing communal discernment that draws on diverse perspectives and experiences
  • Engaging in cultural exegesis—”reading” cultures with the same careful attention given to Scripture

South African theologian David Bosch described this as “prophetic dialogue”—engaging cultures with both affirming and challenging voices, discerning what can be embraced and what must be transformed.

Corporate Confession and Lament

We have sinned and done wrong. We have been wicked and have rebelled; we have turned away from your commands and laws.” (Daniel 9:5)

Just as individuals confess personal sins, communities must develop practices of corporate confession—acknowledging collective participation in systems of injustice and patterns of corporate evil. This includes:

  • Public acknowledgment of historical and present injustices
  • Communal lament that expresses grief over the harm caused by systemic sin
  • Specific identification of how communities have been complicit in unjust structures
  • Genuine repentance that leads to concrete acts of restitution and repair

Biblical figures like Daniel, Ezra, and Nehemiah modeled corporate confession, identifying themselves with their people’s collective sins even when they personally may not have committed specific transgressions. This pattern challenges individualistic approaches to sin and repentance.

Countercultural Communities

But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.” (1 Peter 2:9)

The formation of Christian communities that embody alternative economics, politics, and social relations becomes essential to breaking the dominion of interlocking sins that define surrounding cultures. These communities serve as “contrast societies” that demonstrate God’s kingdom values in concrete ways:

  • Practicing economic sharing that challenges materialistic consumerism
  • Embracing reconciliation across racial, ethnic, and social divisions
  • Modeling environmental stewardship that counters exploitation of creation
  • Cultivating authentic relationships that resist digital fragmentation and isolation

These communities don’t withdraw from society but engage it redemptively, serving as “salt and light” (Matthew 5:13-16) that preserves against corruption and illuminates alternatives to dehumanizing systems.

Coordinated Resistance

Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place…” (Ephesians 6:14)

Just as sins form confederacies of evil, redemptive responses must coordinate virtuous practices that reinforce one another—creating “ecologies of grace” that can effectively counter entrenched systems of sin. This includes:

  • Building coalitions across denominational, organizational, and cultural lines
  • Developing comprehensive approaches that address multiple dimensions of injustice
  • Strategically focusing on key leverage points within systems
  • Creating networks of mutual support and accountability

Paul’s metaphor of the “armor of God” in Ephesians 6 illustrates this coordinated approach—various spiritual practices and virtues working together to resist evil’s multifaceted assault.

 

The Necessity of Gospel Proclamation

For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes.” (Romans 1:16)

While addressing systemic sin through practical action is essential, Redemptive Care remains incomplete without clear proclamation of the gospel. This verbal sharing of Christ’s redemptive work provides the ultimate context and power for transformation:

The Distinctive Message of Salvation

Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12)

While Redemptive Care addresses holistic needs, it maintains the theological conviction that ultimate redemption comes only through Jesus Christ. The verbal articulation of this truth is necessary because the specific means of salvation—faith in Christ alone—cannot be conveyed solely through acts of service.

This proclamation must be offered with cultural sensitivity but without compromising the exclusive claims of the gospel. It recognizes that while all human efforts at justice and restoration are valuable, they remain incomplete without the transformative power of Christ’s redemptive work.

Addressing the Root of Systemic Sin

Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned…” (Romans 5:12)

Gospel proclamation addresses the root cause of organized sin—the fundamental alienation from God that produces all other forms of brokenness. Without this spiritual dimension, efforts at social transformation remain superficial:

  • Political solutions address symptoms but not spiritual roots
  • Economic reforms may redistribute resources without transforming hearts
  • Social programs can provide assistance without spiritual renewal

The gospel declares that through Christ’s death and resurrection, not only are individual sins forgiven, but the very power of sin itself is broken, making possible both personal and social transformation.

Contextual Proclamation

To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews… I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some.” (1 Corinthians 9:20-22)

Effective gospel proclamation requires “translating” biblical truth into categories that engage and challenge the core assumptions of different worldviews. This contextual approach:

  • Identifies cultural “bridges” that connect with existing values and aspirations
  • Challenges cultural “idols” that compete with allegiance to Christ
  • Addresses specific configurations of sin that dominate particular contexts
  • Presents the gospel in culturally appropriate yet biblically faithful ways

The apostle Paul modeled this contextual proclamation at Athens (Acts 17), engaging Greek philosophical categories while maintaining the non-negotiable elements of the gospel.

 

Building Bridges in a Fragmented World

For he himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility...” (Ephesians 2:14)

Redemptive Care creates opportunities for building bridges to those who may be alienated from traditional religious institutions:

Engaging the “Nones” and “Dones”

The growing population of religious “nones” (those who claim no religious affiliation) and “dones” (those who have left religious institutions) represents a significant challenge and opportunity. Redemptive Care can engage these groups by:

  • Demonstrating authentic faith through actions rather than mere words
  • Creating safe spaces for honest questions and doubts
  • Addressing the historic failures and hypocrisies of religious institutions
  • Modeling a faith that connects spiritual convictions with social responsibility

Many who reject institutional religion remain deeply concerned about justice, meaning, and human flourishing—creating natural connection points for redemptive engagement.

Interfaith Collaboration

If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.” (Romans 12:18)

In contexts of religious plurality, Redemptive Care can build bridges through appropriate collaboration with those of other faith traditions:

  • Identifying shared concerns for justice and human dignity
  • Partnering on specific initiatives that address common social challenges
  • Maintaining clear Christian identity while showing genuine respect
  • Creating spaces for authentic dialogue about ultimate questions

Such collaboration demonstrates Christ’s love while creating opportunities for gospel witness. It recognizes that common grace enables those of different faiths to perceive aspects of moral truth, even while maintaining that complete truth and salvation are found only in Christ.

Technological Engagement

See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ.” (Colossians 2:8)

Digital technologies create both new confederacies of evil and new opportunities for redemptive engagement:

  • Using digital platforms to amplify marginalized voices
  • Creating online communities that model healthy relationship and dialogue
  • Developing digital literacy that enables critical engagement with information
  • Addressing technological addictions and dependencies that fragment human connection

As digital spaces increasingly shape human identity and community, Redemptive Care must develop approaches that address both the promises and perils of technological innovation.

 

Case Studies in Redemptive Care

South Africa: Confronting Apartheid’s Legacy

South Africa’s journey from apartheid to democracy offers insights into both the challenges and possibilities of confronting organized sin:

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) established after apartheid’s end represents one approach to addressing historical injustice. While imperfect, it created space for:

  • Public acknowledgment of specific atrocities
  • Testimonies from both victims and perpetrators
  • Conditional amnesty tied to full disclosure
  • Recommendations for institutional reforms and reparations

Christian leaders like Archbishop Desmond Tutu grounded the TRC in theological concepts of confession, forgiveness, and reconciliation, demonstrating how Christian principles can inform public justice processes.

However, persistent economic inequality and racial tensions demonstrate that formal political transitions alone cannot heal deep social wounds. Ongoing Redemptive Care initiatives in South Africa include:

  • Faith-based economic development in historically disadvantaged communities
  • Church-led racial reconciliation efforts that address both personal and structural dimensions
  • Educational initiatives that challenge historical narratives and promote healing
  • Community organizing that empowers local leadership and agency

Urban Centers: Holistic Mission in Fragmented Spaces

Urban centers often concentrate both organized injustice and cultural diversity, creating unique challenges and opportunities for Redemptive Care:

  • Community development corporations that integrate economic opportunity, housing, education, and spiritual formation
  • Multi-ethnic church plants that model reconciliation across racial and class lines
  • Arts initiatives that create spaces for cultural expression and healing
  • Advocacy coalitions that address unjust policies while providing direct services

Urban practitioners like Dr. John Perkins have pioneered approaches that integrate evangelism, community development, and justice advocacy—demonstrating that comprehensive transformation requires attention to both spiritual and material dimensions of human flourishing.

Digital Contexts: Redemptive Engagement Online

As digital spaces increasingly shape human identity and community, new approaches to Redemptive Care are emerging:

  • Digital literacy programs that help vulnerable populations navigate online environments
  • Faith-based content creation that counters dehumanizing narratives
  • Online communities that foster genuine connection and spiritual formation
  • Advocacy efforts addressing digital divides and algorithmic injustice

Organizations like the Center for Humane Technology integrate technological expertise with ethical frameworks to promote digital environments that support human flourishing rather than exploitation.

 

Toward a Comprehensive Approach

For from him and through him and for him are all things. To him be the glory forever! Amen.” (Romans 11:36)

Effectively confronting confederacies of evil requires a comprehensive approach that integrates multiple dimensions:

Spiritual Warfare and Organized Change

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.” (Ephesians 6:12)

Redemptive Care recognizes that behind human systems of evil stand spiritual forces that require spiritual weapons of warfare. This integration of spiritual and structural approaches includes:

  • Prayer and fasting that identify and confront spiritual strongholds
  • Prophetic naming of idolatrous systems and structures
  • Spiritual discernment that reveals hidden dynamics of oppression
  • Deliverance ministries that address both personal and collective bondage

Walter Wink’s work on “naming the powers” provides a framework for identifying how spiritual forces operate through concrete social, economic, and political structures—requiring responses that address both dimensions.

Personal Transformation and Structural Change

Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.” (Romans 12:2)

Effective Redemptive Care holds together personal and structural transformation, recognizing their interdependence:

  • Personal renewal creates agents of structural change
  • Structural reforms create space for personal flourishing
  • Community formation bridges individual and systemic dimensions
  • Spiritual disciplines shape both inner character and outer action

This integration resists both individualistic approaches that ignore systemic dimensions and collectivist approaches that neglect personal responsibility and transformation.

Local Action and Global Awareness

From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.” (Acts 17:26)

Redemptive Care operates simultaneously at local and global levels:

  • Local initiatives address specific contextual manifestations of injustice
  • Global awareness connects local struggles to international systems
  • Cross-cultural partnerships strengthen all participants
  • Solidarity networks amplify impact across geographic boundaries

This glocal approach recognizes that confederacies of evil operate across national boundaries while acknowledging that effective response must be rooted in specific local contexts.

 

Conclusion: Participating in God’s Redemptive Mission

For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.” (Colossians 1:19-20)

Confronting confederacies of evil through Redemptive Care is ultimately participation in God’s comprehensive mission to “reconcile to himself all things” through Christ. This mission:

  • Addresses both personal sin and organized injustice
  • Integrates proclamation and demonstration of the gospel
  • Requires both spiritual power and practical wisdom
  • Involves both immediate relief and long-term transformation

As participants in this mission, we recognize that ultimate victory over evil has already been secured through Christ’s death and resurrection, even as we continue to work toward the full manifestation of God’s kingdom in the here and now. This eschatological perspective provides both motivation and hope—we work not to establish God’s kingdom through human effort but to participate in what God is already doing to make all things new.

In a world fragmented by division and injustice, Redemptive Care offers a holistic approach that confronts confederacies of evil while pointing to the ultimate source of healing and hope in Christ. By integrating word and deed, personal and structural transformation, and local and global perspectives, we participate in God’s mission to dismantle systems of oppression and build communities that reflect his redemptive purposes for all creation.

 

Sources

Bosch, David J. (2011). Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission. Orbis Books.

Brueggemann, Walter. (2018). The Prophetic Imagination. Fortress Press.

Corbett, Steve and Brian Fikkert. (2014). When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty Without Hurting the Poor…and Yourself. Moody Publishers.

Darr, Ryan. (2017). “Social Sin and Social Wrongs: Moral Responsibility in a Structurally Disordered World” in Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, Volume 37, Number 2, Fall/Winter 2017, pp. 21-37

Gornik, Mark R. (2002). To Live in Peace: Biblical Faith and the Changing Inner City. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

Himes, Kenneth. (1986). “Social Sin and the Role of the Individual” in The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics. Society of Christian Ethics (U.S.)

Jennings, Willie James. (2010). The Christian Imagination: Theology and the Origins of Race. Yale University Press.

Katongole, Emmanuel and Chris Rice. (2008). Reconciling All Things: A Christian Vision for Justice, Peace and Healing. IVP Books.

Kerans, Patrick. (1974) Sinful Social Structures. Fortress Press.

McAlpine, Thomas H. (1991). Facing the Powers: What are the Options? MARC/World Vision

Newbigin, Lesslie. (1989). The Gospel in a Pluralist Society. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

Perkins, John M. (2007). Beyond Charity: The Call to Christian Community Development. Baker Books.

Volf, Miroslav. (1996). Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation. Abingdon Press.

Wink, Walter. (1984). Naming the Powers: The Language of Power in the New Testament. Fortress Press.

Wright, Christopher J.H. (2006). The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible’s Grand Narrative. IVP Academic.

Wright, N.T. (2016). The Day the Revolution Began: Reconsidering the Meaning of Jesus’s Crucifixion. HarperOne.

 

Related Posts